<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NJ Family Issues &#187; necessaries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues/tag/necessaries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues</link>
	<description>Information and Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The doctrine of necessaries is a common law rule imposing liability on both spouses for the debt of one spouse, provided that the debt was incurred for &#8220;necessaries&#8221; for the family, and the debtor spouse is unable to pay the debt</title>
		<link>http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues/2008/01/24/necessaries-spouse-debt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues/2008/01/24/necessaries-spouse-debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PaulKostro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[*All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[necessaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spousal-debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spousal-support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues/?p=3585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law Lessons from ANN and GEORGE RIENZO v. FREDERIC PARISI, App. Div., A-3083-06T1, January 24, 2008: The doctrine of necessaries is a common law rule imposing liability on both spouses for the debt of one spouse, provided that the debt was incurred for &#8220;necessaries&#8221; for the family, and the debtor spouse is unable to pay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="more-3585"></span><br />
<strong>Law Lessons</strong> from <a href="http://lawlibrary.rutgers.edu/decisions/appellate/a3083-06.opn.html" target="_blank">ANN and GEORGE RIENZO v. FREDERIC PARISI</a>, App. Div., A-3083-06T1, January 24, 2008:</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ramona538/3628693133/" target="_blank"><img alt="Picture by Ramona.Forcella" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2483/3628693133_3e43d79169_m_d.jpg" width="240" height="182" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Picture by Ramona.Forcella</p></div>
<p>The doctrine of necessaries is a common law rule imposing liability on both spouses for the debt of one spouse, provided that the debt was incurred for &#8220;necessaries&#8221; for the family, and the debtor spouse is unable to pay the debt. Jersey Shore Med. Ctr. v. Baum, 84 N.J. 137, 141 (1980). A necessary is a good or service provided to one spouse that benefits both. Id. at 141-49. The doctrine derived from the common law rule requiring a husband to support his wife. Id. at 141. The duty to support imposes liability on the husband for necessaries furnished to the wife because the expenses incurred by the wife presume a failure on the part of the husband to provide necessaries for her. Id. at 142. The doctrine is applied equally to both husbands and wives. Id. at 148-49. It provides:</p>
<blockquote><p>[B]oth spouses are liable for necessary expenses incurred by either spouse in the course of the marriage. . . . [T]he financial resources of both spouses should be available to pay a creditor who provides necessary goods and services to either spouse. . . . [A] judgment creditor must first seek satisfaction from the income and other property of the spouse who incurred the debt. If those financial resources are insufficient, the creditor may then seek satisfaction from the income and property of the other spouse.</p></blockquote>
<p>[Id. at 141.] </p>
<p>=================</p>
<p><strong>But see:</strong> National Account Systems, Inc. v. Mercado, 196 N.J. Super. 133 (App. Div. 1984) (Wife not liable for the hospital bills of her husband from whom she had been separated for four years).<br />
<br/></p>
<p><strong>See related article</strong> by Donald D. Vanarelli, Esq.: <a href="http://www.dvanarelli.com/article-insolvent-estates-and-related-issues.html" target="_blank">Insolvent Estates and Related Issues</a></p>
<p><br/><br />
<object type="text/x-scriptlet"  width=100% height="200" data="http://www.kostrolaw.com/special/NJFamilyIssuesPostTail.html"><br />
</object><br />
<br/></p>
Note: There is a print link embedded within this post, please visit this post to print it.
<div STYLE="line-height: 1pt; font-size: 1pt; color: white">This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. Kostro, Esq., an attorney/lawyer/mediator in Linden, Union County, New Jersey.  My legal and mediation services are offered to Polish-speaking and other clients in Union, Middlesex, Somerset, Essex, Hudson, Bergen, and Morris counties in NJ; including the municipalities of Fanwood 07023; Garwood 07027; Kenilworth 07033; Mountainside 07092; New Providence 07974; Roselle Park 07204; Roselle 07203; Elizabeth 07201; Linden 07036; Plainfield 07060; Rahway 07065; Summit 07901; Westfield 07090; Berkeley Heights 07922; Clark 07066; Cranford 07016; Hillside 07205; Scotch Plains 07076; Springfield 07081; Union 07083; Winfield; Carteret 07008; Dunellen 08812; East Brunswick 08816; Edison 08817; Jamesburg 08831; Metuchen 08840; New Brunswick 08901; Old Bridge 08857; Perth Amboy 08861; Sayreville 08871; South Amboy 08878; South River 08877; Avenel 07001; Colonia 07067; Iselin 08830; Woodbridge 07095; Somerset 08873; Somerville 08876 and Watchung 07069, New Jersey. My legal services include family law, divorce, child support, litigation, arbitration, mediation, child custody and visitation, alimony, equitable distribution, separation agreements, palimony, PSA, property settlement agreement, premarital and prenuptial agreements, midmarriage and marital agreements. My Law Office is located at 726 West Saint Georges [W. St. Georges] Avenue (Route 27), Linden, Union County, NJ. Telephone: 908-486-2200 Adwokat / Prawnik Adwokaci Pawel Kostro mowi po polsku.</div>
<p>NOTE: My legal and mediation services are offered to Polish-speaking and other clients in Union, Middlesex, Somerset, Essex, Hudson, Bergen, and Morris counties in NJ.</p>
<p><br/><strong>Technorati Tags:</strong> <a href='http://technorati.com/tag/necessaries' rel='nofollow'>necessaries</a>, <a href='http://technorati.com/tag/spousal-debt' rel='nofollow'>spousal-debt</a>, <a href='http://technorati.com/tag/spousal-support' rel='nofollow'>spousal-support</a>,  and  <a href='http://www.thisismyurl.com'>easy technorati tags for wordpress plugin</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues/2008/01/24/necessaries-spouse-debt/" rel="bookmark">The doctrine of necessaries is a common law rule imposing liability on both spouses for the debt of one spouse, provided that the debt was incurred for &#8220;necessaries&#8221; for the family, and the debtor spouse is unable to pay the debt</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues">NJ Family Issues</a> on January 24, 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues/2008/01/24/necessaries-spouse-debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

