Law Lessons from C.K. VS. T.K., App. Div., A-3918-11T4, May 9, 2013:
The mere finding of a predicate act of domestic violence, standing alone, is insufficient to support the issuance of an FRO. Kamen v. Egan, 322 N.J. Super. 222, 227 (App. Div. 1999). An FRO should only issue after “an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), [and] to protect the victim from an immediate danger or to prevent further abuse.” Silver, supra, 387 N.J. Super. at 127.
NOTE from Paul G. Kostro, Esq.: If you are interested in Mediation; or have issues relating to Divorce, Domestic Violence, Child Support or Other Legal Matters, please call me to schedule an appointment — I can be reached by telephone at (908)486-2200; or by Email.
NOTE: My Law Office is located at 726 West Saint Georges [W. St. Georges] Avenue (Route 27), Linden, Union County, NJ. Telephone: 908-486-2200; EM@IL