NJ Family Issues

RSS | Comments RSS

The elective share statute was enacted to prohibit disinheritance of a surviving spouse who needs continuous support

Comments Off No Comments»
February 23, 2013 at 12:32 pm


Law Lessons from In the Matter of the Estate of Peck, __ N.J. Super. __ (Ch. Div. 2013), Sussex County, Docket No. P-825-12, Gannon, J.S.C., JANUARY 24, 2013:

The language of the New Jersey elective share statute specifically states what property is to be included and excluded from the augmented estate. N.J.S.A. 3B:8-3(a) provides:

The “augmented estate” means the estate reduced by funeral and administration expenses, and enforceable claims, to which is added the value of property transferred by the decedent at any time during marriage, or during a domestic partnership, to or for the benefit of any person other than the surviving spouse or domestic partner, to the extent that the decedent did not receive adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth for the transfer, if the transfer is of any of the following types:

a. Any transfer made after May 28, 1980, under which the decedent retained at the time of his death the possession or enjoyment of, or right to income from, the property.

It is of no significance that the property is located in a foreign country, as the augmented estate “includes out of state real property to the same extent as it would be included if it were located in New Jersey.” In re Estate of Cole, 200 N.J. Super. 396, 402 (Ch. Div. 1984) (citing N.J.S.A. 3B:8-2).

However, N.J.S.A. 3B:8-5 excludes transfers made with the written consent or joinder of the surviving spouse, life and accident insurance, joint annuities or pensions payable to another.

The elective share statute was enacted to “prohibit disinheritance of a surviving spouse who needs continuous support.” McKay v. Estate of McKay, 184 N.J. Super. 217, 224 (Law Div. 1982) (citing N.J.S.A. 3A:38-1, the predecessor to N.J.S.A. 3B:8-1 to -19). The elective share statute has nothing to do with carrying out the decedent’s actual intent. In fact, the statute may be utilized to circumvent the actual intent to disinherit a surviving spouse.



NOTE from Paul G. Kostro, Esq.: If you are interested in Mediation; or have issues relating to Divorce, Domestic Violence, Child Support or Other Legal Matters, please call me to schedule an appointment — I can be reached by telephone at (908)486-2200; or by Email.


[HOME]

NOTE: My legal and mediation services are offered to clients in Fanwood 07023; Garwood 07027; Kenilworth 07033; Mountainside 07092; New Providence 07974; Roselle Park 07204; Roselle 07203; Elizabeth 07201; Linden 07036; Plainfield 07060; Rahway 07065; Summit 07901; Westfield 07090; Berkeley Heights 07922; Clark 07066; Cranford 07016; Hillside 07205; Scotch Plains 07076; Springfield 07081; Union 07083; Winfield; Carteret 07008; Dunellen 08812; East Brunswick 08816; Edison 08817; Jamesburg 08831; Metuchen 08840; New Brunswick 08901; Old Bridge 08857; Perth Amboy 08861; Sayreville 08871; South Amboy 08878; South River 08877; Avenel 07001; Colonia 07067; Iselin 08830; Woodbridge 07095; Somerset 08873; Somerville 08876 and Watchung 07069, New Jersey.

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.