NJ Family Issues

RSS | Comments RSS

The doctrine of invited error bars a litigant from arguing on appeal that an adverse decision below was the product of error, when that party urged the lower court to adopt the proposition now alleged to be error

Comments Off No Comments»
November 13, 2012 at 12:15 pm


Law Lessons from MARGARET A. MEANS VS. WILLIAM J. SNIPES, App. Div., A-5710-09T3, October 29, 2012:

The doctrine of invited error bars a litigant “from arguing on appeal that an adverse decision below was the product of error, when that party urged the lower court to adopt the proposition now alleged to be error.” Brett v. Great Am. Recreation, Inc., 144 N.J. 479, 503 (1996); see also M.C. III, supra, 201 N.J. at 340.



NOTE from Paul G. Kostro, Esq.: If you are interested in Mediation; or have issues relating to Divorce, Domestic Violence, Child Support or Other Legal Matters, please call me to schedule an appointment — I can be reached by telephone at (908)232-6500; or by Email.


[HOME]
NOTE: My Law Office is located at 116 South Euclid Avenue, Westfield, Union County, NJ. Telephone: 908-232-6500; EM@IL

NOTE: This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. Kostro, Esq., an attorney/lawyer/mediator in Linden, Union County, New Jersey.

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.