NJ Family Issues

RSS | Comments RSS

In order to recover damages based on legal malpractice, a plaintiff has the burden to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that specific damages were sustained as a proximate result of a defendant’s wrongful conduct

Comments Off No Comments»
February 10, 2012 at 6:49 pm


Law Lessons from RENATE GRAVERS, ET AL. V. PETER U. LANFRIT, ESQ., ET AL., App. Div., A-3205-10T1, February 3, 2012:

In order to recover damages based on legal malpractice, a plaintiff has the burden to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that specific damages were sustained as a proximate result of a defendant’s wrongful conduct. See Lieberman v. Emp’rs Ins. of Wausau, 84 N.J. 325, 342 (1980). “Although we require a reasonably accurate and fair basis for the computation of alleged lost profits, the fact that a plaintiff may not be able to fix its damages with precision will not necessarily preclude recovery of damages.” V.A.L. Floors, Inc. v. Westminster Cmtys., Inc., 355 N.J. Super. 416, 424 (App. Div. 2002). “Loss of profits, where based on sound fact and not on mere opinion evidence without factual support, is recognized as a proper measure of damages if ‘capable of being estimated with a reasonable degree of certainty.’” Stanley Co. of Am. v. Hercules Powder Co., 16 N.J. 295, 314 (1954) (quoting Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp., 4 N.J. 135, 144 (1950)).

However, “[a]nticipated profits that are too remote, uncertain, or speculative are not recoverable.” Desai v. Bd. of Adjustment of Phillipsburg, 360 N.J. Super. 586, 595 (App. Div.) (citing Stanley Co., supra, 16 N.J. at 314; V.A.L. Floors, supra, 355 N.J. Super. at 426), certif. denied, 177 N.J. 492 (2003).

Also, “prospective profits of a new business are considered too remote and speculative to meet the legal standard of reasonable certainty.” RSB Laboratory Servs., Inc. v. BSI, Corp., 368 N.J. Super. 540, 556 (App. Div. 2004) (citing In re Merritt Logan, Inc., 901 F.2d 349, 356 (3d Cir. 1990); Weiss v. Revenue Bldg. & Loan Ass’n, 116 N.J.L. 208, 212 (E. & A. 1936)).






Print This Post Print This Post

NOTE: My legal and mediation services are offered to clients in Fanwood 07023; Garwood 07027; Kenilworth 07033; Mountainside 07092; New Providence 07974; Roselle Park 07204; Roselle 07203; Elizabeth 07201; Linden 07036; Plainfield 07060; Rahway 07065; Summit 07901; Westfield 07090; Berkeley Heights 07922; Clark 07066; Cranford 07016; Hillside 07205; Scotch Plains 07076; Springfield 07081; Union 07083; Winfield; Carteret 07008; Dunellen 08812; East Brunswick 08816; Edison 08817; Jamesburg 08831; Metuchen 08840; New Brunswick 08901; Old Bridge 08857; Perth Amboy 08861; Sayreville 08871; South Amboy 08878; South River 08877; Avenel 07001; Colonia 07067; Iselin 08830; Woodbridge 07095; Somerset 08873; Somerville 08876 and Watchung 07069, New Jersey.

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.