Law Lessons from MARILYN GORMAN f/k/a MARILYN CRUZ V. LUIS CRUZ, App. Div., A-0182-08T3, November 18, 2009:
Where matters in dispute on a post-judgment motion in an action for divorce are addressed in an agreement between the parties, the agreement is “‘entitled to considerable weight with respect to [its] validity and enforceability’ in equity, provided [it is] fair and just.” Dolce v. Dolce, 383 N.J. Super. 11, 20 (App. Div. 2006) (quoting Petersen v. Petersen, 85 N.J. 638, 642 (1981)); see also Lepis v. Lepis, 83 N.J. 139, 153 (1980).
Where the meaning of the agreement is in dispute, “[t]he court’s role is to consider what is written [in the agreement] in the context of the circumstances at the time of drafting and to apply a rational meaning in keeping with the ‘expressed general purpose.’” Pacifico v. Pacifico, 190 N.J. 258, 266 (2007) (quoting Atl. N. Airlines, Inc. v. Schwimmer, 12 N.J. 293, 302 (1953)).
An important indicator of what parties to an agreement intend is their course of performance tendered pursuant to that agreement. Joseph Hilton & Assocs., Inc. v. Evans, 201 N.J. Super. 156, 171 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 101 N.J. 326 (1985); Regan v. Regan, 246 N.J. Super. 475 (Ch. Div. 1990).
Print This Post
NOTE: My legal and mediation services are offered to clients in Fanwood 07023; Garwood 07027; Kenilworth 07033; Mountainside 07092; New Providence 07974; Roselle Park 07204; Roselle 07203; Elizabeth 07201; Linden 07036, New Jersey.
Technorati Tags: property-settlement-agreement, psa, and easy technorati tags for wordpress plugin
Leave a comment
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.