NJ Family Issues

RSS | Comments RSS

The non-custodial parent or secondary caretaker bears the burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that despite the presumption favoring the custodial parent’s choice of name, the chosen surname is not in the best interests of the child.

Comments Off No Comments»
April 5, 2008 at 7:52 am

Law Lessons from from SHANKS v. ARRIETA, Appellate Division, A-5757-05T5, October 1, 2007 [LINK]:

Photo by moultriecreek

Photo by moultriecreek

The Supreme Court has held that the non-custodial parent or secondary caretaker “bears the burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that despite the presumption favoring the custodial parent’s [or secondary caretaker’s] choice of name, the chosen surname is not in the best interests of the child.” Gubernat v. Deremer, 140 N.J. 120, 145 (1995); see also Ronan v. Adely, 182 N.J. 103, 109 (2004).


No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.