NJ Family Issues
RSS | Comments RSS

Archive for February, 2006

*All Posts,Palimony Issues

A critical element of a palimony claim is cohabitation for a significant period of time

Comments Off
February 26, 2006 at 2:50 pm

(more…)

*All Posts,Domestic-violence,Harassment

The annoyance or alarm caused by a single comment need not be serious, whereas the annoyance caused by a course of conduct must be serious

Comments Off
February 22, 2006 at 12:53 pm

(more…)

*All Posts,Domestic-violence,Harassment

If defendant had communicated in a manner likely to cause annoyance, it matters not that plaintiff was never alarmed

Comments Off
February 15, 2006 at 4:42 pm

(more…)

*All Posts,Domestic-violence,Harassment

It is incumbent upon plaintiff to establish by a preponderance of the credible evidence that defendant had a purpose to harass

Comments Off
February 10, 2006 at 4:46 pm

(more…)

*All Posts,Domestic-violence,Evidence

Prior acts may be considered to resolve a dispute over whether the incident alleged as an act of domestic violence was an accident

Comments (0)
February 9, 2006 at 5:42 pm

(more…)

*All Posts,Agreements,Child-support,Child-support-modification,Emancipation | Tags:

Emancipation – the conclusion of the fundamental dependent relationship between parent and child – is not a self-executing principle

Comments Off
February 7, 2006 at 11:16 am

(more…)

*All Posts,Palimony Issues

Cohabitation is an indispensable element of a cause of action seeking palimony support

Comments Off
February 6, 2006 at 2:56 pm

(more…)

*All Posts,Child-custody,Child-visitation,Domestic-violence

When parents are involved in domestic violence, the need to protect the “non-abusive spouse” is one consideration to be weighed by the court when evaluating the entry of an order that impacts the parent-child relationship

Comments Off
February 2, 2006 at 11:31 am

(more…)

Copyright 2009 Paul G. Kostro | Powered by WordPress | Businesso v1.0.2 by noonnoo | Log in