NJ Family Issues

RSS | Comments RSS

The purpose of the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act is to assure the victims of domestic violence the maximum protection from abuse the law can provide

Comments Off No Comments»
October 21, 2005 at 4:39 pm


Law Lessons from State v. Haas (App. Div., Docket No. A-2772-04T5, Decided October 21, 2005, not approved for publication):

The laudable purpose of the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act is “to assure the victims of domestic violence the maximum protection from abuse the law can provide.” N.J.S.A. 2C:25-18; see Cesare v. Cesare, 154 N.J. 394, 399-400 (1998). The Act is comprehensive and authorizes, inter alia, the entry of orders pertaining to the issues of child custody, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29b(11); parenting time, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29b(3); and risk assessments to determine whether a particular parenting-time arrangement constitutes a risk of harm to the child, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29b(3)(a) and -29b(3)(b).

The Act further provides that when considering the terms of a restraining order, the court must consider, inter alia, “[t]he best interests of the victim and any child[,]” N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29a(4), and when “determining custody and parenting time the protection of the victim’s safety[,]” N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29a(5). More specifically, courts are statutorily cautioned that “[p]arenting time arrangements shall not compromise any other remedy provided by the court by requiring or encouraging contact between the plaintiff and defendant.” N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29b(3).

Violating the provisions of a domestic violence final restraining order (FRO) issued pursuant to the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act subjects the violator to a charge of domestic violence contempt. N.J.S.A. 2C:29-9b.

If the violator had a prior conviction for domestic violence contempt, the violator is then subject to the imposition of a minimum term of not less than thirty days’ imprisonment. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-30.






Print This Post Print This Post
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. Kostro, Esq., an attorney/lawyer/mediator in Linden, Union County, New Jersey. My legal and mediation services are offered to Polish-speaking and other clients in Union, Middlesex, Somerset, Essex, Hudson, Bergen, and Morris counties in NJ; including the municipalities of Fanwood 07023; Garwood 07027; Kenilworth 07033; Mountainside 07092; New Providence 07974; Roselle Park 07204; Roselle 07203; Elizabeth 07201; Linden 07036; Plainfield 07060; Rahway 07065; Summit 07901; Westfield 07090; Berkeley Heights 07922; Clark 07066; Cranford 07016; Hillside 07205; Scotch Plains 07076; Springfield 07081; Union 07083; Winfield; Carteret 07008; Dunellen 08812; East Brunswick 08816; Edison 08817; Jamesburg 08831; Metuchen 08840; New Brunswick 08901; Old Bridge 08857; Perth Amboy 08861; Sayreville 08871; South Amboy 08878; South River 08877; Avenel 07001; Colonia 07067; Iselin 08830; Woodbridge 07095; Somerset 08873; Somerville 08876 and Watchung 07069, New Jersey. My legal services include family law, divorce, child support, litigation, arbitration, mediation, child custody and visitation, alimony, equitable distribution, separation agreements, palimony, PSA, property settlement agreement, premarital and prenuptial agreements, midmarriage and marital agreements. My Law Office is located at 726 West Saint Georges [W. St. Georges] Avenue (Route 27), Linden, Union County, NJ. Telephone: 908-486-2200 Adwokat / Prawnik Adwokaci Pawel Kostro mowi po polsku.

NOTE: My legal services include family law, divorce, child support, litigation, arbitration, mediation, child custody and visitation, alimony, equitable distribution, separation agreements, palimony, PSA, property settlement agreement, premarital and prenuptial agreements, midmarriage and marital agreements.


Technorati Tags: , and easy technorati tags for wordpress plugin

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.